|
The one thing I find most interesting when you are talking to people and trying to explain a position that you take, is that most people are quite set in their positions and don't really want to move off that position.
What I don't understand is why 2A people have their argument down pat and will not listen to reasonable debate. There has to be middle ground somewhere that will prevent what we are experiencing as far as gun violence goes. How many more must we sacrifice in the name of "god given rights to own a mass killing weapon" before we can talk about reasonable limitations? After all, that's what these weapons are designed for. They're not "sporting rifles", they're not "hunting rifles", they are designed to inflict the most lethal damage in the shortest period of time. Where is the argument here? Comments are closed.
|
|
RSS Feed
